I'v seen two major approaches to developing and scheduling worship teams...The FIXED TEAM approach and the ROTATING TEAM approach.
Some leaders like to choose a FIXED TEAM that they work with week after week. The argument with this approach is that the members get to know each other intimately and are able to connect musically, emotionally and spiritually with great ease and comfort. This is a bonded, high-functioning team with great flexibility and freedom. They've learned to work off of each other and can anticipate each other's moves. Because they play and sing every week, they keep their skills well-honed and lead worship with excellence and limited distraction.
Some leaders choose ROTATING TEAMS. Leaders who use this approach have team members sing or play about once or twice a month and typically serve with a different group of people each time they lead. This approach allows many more volunteers to serve and use their gifts in the church. It also gives leaders a great opportunity to mentor and train artists within their church. This approach requires a larger investment of time and energy on the part of the leader to create excellence and spiritual connectedness in worship but keeps worship team members from "burn out" with a pool of people ready to fill in when a team member gets sick or has to go out of town.
I know that a leader's approach will depend a lot on the amount of time they have to invest in their ministry, the size of their ministry and the resources they have to pull from. This post is not to say one approach is better than the other. There are pros and cons to both depending on the situation.
That being said, I've had the privilege of serving in churches where there is a good amount of talent. As a pastor, I believe my role needs to be what's outlined in Ephesians 4:11-12; an equipper of worshiping artists to do the work on ministry. In light of that, for me to pick a team of the most gifted in our church and using only them has never been an option for me. I know it would allow our church to have consistent excellence, more creativity in worship and a lot less work for me but I would feel as if I wasn't fulfilling my role as a pastor; I want to allow every gifted person in our congregation an opportunity to grow and use their gifts for leading worship.
I understand the necessity of excellence and creativity in our worship, especially in today's culture which can be very critical of the church and its music. To me, it's worth the extra effort and sacrifice of a musically professional presentation to see people grow in their artistic expression and work toward excellence. When we create fixed teams that make leading easier, we have to guard against going into "auto pilot". There's a little bit of insecurity and thus, dependence on the Holy Spirit with a rotating team that doesn't always exist in a fixed team setting. Let' s not assume that the Holy Spirit doesn't use this dependence to reach even the most cynical critic.
I know that a leader's approach will depend a lot on the amount of time they have to invest in their ministry, the size of their ministry and the resources they have to pull from. This post is not to say one approach is better than the other. There are pros and cons to both depending on the situation.
That being said, I've had the privilege of serving in churches where there is a good amount of talent. As a pastor, I believe my role needs to be what's outlined in Ephesians 4:11-12; an equipper of worshiping artists to do the work on ministry. In light of that, for me to pick a team of the most gifted in our church and using only them has never been an option for me. I know it would allow our church to have consistent excellence, more creativity in worship and a lot less work for me but I would feel as if I wasn't fulfilling my role as a pastor; I want to allow every gifted person in our congregation an opportunity to grow and use their gifts for leading worship.
I understand the necessity of excellence and creativity in our worship, especially in today's culture which can be very critical of the church and its music. To me, it's worth the extra effort and sacrifice of a musically professional presentation to see people grow in their artistic expression and work toward excellence. When we create fixed teams that make leading easier, we have to guard against going into "auto pilot". There's a little bit of insecurity and thus, dependence on the Holy Spirit with a rotating team that doesn't always exist in a fixed team setting. Let' s not assume that the Holy Spirit doesn't use this dependence to reach even the most cynical critic.
So what situation are you in? Do you use a FIXED TEAM approach or a ROTATING TEAM approach? Why?
If you use the FIXED TEAM approach, how do you deal with new musicians who come into your church? What do you do when someone on your team needs to take a break and you need someone to fill in?
If you use the ROTATING TEAM approach, how do you work to develop musical excellence and spiritual bonding when you don't have the same team every week?
Let's get the ideas rolling.
Let's get the ideas rolling.
